What Happens if Wladimir Klitschko Beats Anthony Joshua?

The buzz surrounding Anthony Joshua is incredible, unprecedented even, so much so – that no one has really even considered he could lose to Wladimir Klitschko at Wembley on Saturday.

He could.  Personally, I’ve got the Ukrainian down to win albeit with a few reservations.  He is 41, hasn’t fought for a while now and was outclassed by Tyson Fury when he was last seen.

Joshua has the power to down anyone but he’s got to land a big punch or two for that to count and Klitschko is an expert at staying out of trouble.  Fury won with his jab and that isn’t a tactic Joshua can adopt, or one he should.

The 27-year-old has completed just 44 rounds in the ring in his 18 fights – that’s barely two hours.  Two hours of preparation to take on the man who has dominated the heavyweight division for over a decade.

But Joshua is the odds-on favourite and the expectation on him is huge.  A few boxing pundits and hardcore fans are going for a Klitschko win but the average man on the street, the people who only tune in to the Eddie Hearn’s Matchroom specials on Sky and will make up the vast majority of the audience on Saturday both in the stadium and via PPV, are expecting a Joshua demolition.

But this isn’t a formality and there is a very real chance Joshua loses.  And what happens in that scenario?

Any other fighter with Joshua’s level of experience would be rated as a prospect, regardless of the fact he holds the IBF heavyweight strap, but the hype-machine behind him has been as effective as his monster punching and the general consensus is he’s already a bona fide heavyweight star.

Joshua has the chance to back up all the plaudits he’s received on Saturday but if he is beaten, irrespective of the manner of the defeat, he will still be an up-and-coming fighter at worst in my eyes, it just remains to be seen how kind or cruel the media will be in the aftermath.

So if Joshua does go down, or is schooled and is on the wrong side of a one-sided points call, just remember he should still be judged as if he’s still on a very steep learning curve, rather than a failure.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.


Gonzo Guest Article: Sam Allardyce is a Disgrace, but the Reaction is Worse

Another guest offering from Jacque Talbot, find him on Twitter @Jac_Talbot or on his own site.  As always publication doesn’t imply endorsement or agreement.  He’s not happy with Sam Allardyce, clearly….

Entrapment has won” Sam Allardyce told the cameras on the doorstep of his luxury home. He then said he planned an extensive holiday abroad to get over the terrible news. It must be tough hearing about your grubby misdemeanours, especially when you have been caught.

That’s not everyone’s opinion, today’s multimillion pound climate leads many into temptation according to ex-Newcastle man and another failed England boss.

Steve McClaren had this to say: “It’s been a hugely disappointing couple of days for English football. And I’m very sad for what has happened to Sam Allardyce. It could happen to any of us in high profile sports position […] Sam innocently paid the price”

Here’s BBC regular Ian Wright expressing his outrage: “I’m gutted for him, simply because it’s taken him such a long time to get this dream job.”

“I respected him before and that isn’t going to change” the esteemed Manchester United manager, Jose Mourinho stated.

Jesus, guys, hasn’t he had enough now?

Sam Allardyce was caught out (or set up if you like) by investigatory reporters from the Telegraph acting as foreign investors who probed a 10 month operation into football corruption.

He was caught on secret film giving advice on how to get around third-party player ownership rules and in exchange he was proposed a juicy £400,000 – an amount which works out as just under a sixth of the whopping £3,000,000 sum he received as England manager.

What is most strange about his whole ‘Football for Sale’ drama is just how pundits in the media have reacted. You would have thought, considering highly paid, respectable, current managers in English football were exposed to taking part in under the table deals, they might have condemned them for it, even more inconceivably, they might have at least tried to seem shocked.

Instead, what we get is a bunch of TV pundits showing remorse that the “victims” got caught. A disapproving shake the head rather than fuelled rage and complete disgust. The notion that Sam Allardyce could be a conniving, greedy and calculating crook is beyond them.  Rather, they speak of him more as clumsy character out of a Beano magazine who comically tripped over a banana skin in front of the classroom.

It is hard to imagine that the only people in football who behave as Allardyce did are the people who have been caught. I fear this goes much deeper and could well be stained within the cultural fabric of English football.

But, it looks like the media have moved on already.  More talk about Wayne Rooney’s England role please guys, you haven’t quite ran that one completely into the ground. How about Rooney as a rush-goalie – have you explored that angle?

There is plenty wrong with the FA but when Sam Allardyce chose to accept illicit payments, it was not out of protest of them. This was the association that gave him the chance to work at his dream job – picture him as a budding 18-year-old girl singer gobbled up by X-Factor and Simon Cowell, if that is at all possible.

So please feel no sympathy with this cretin for losing his multi-million pound salary. It’s not like he is short of cash either, considering he is able to fly off to Big Sam’s Villa at a day’s notice.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.

Gonzo Sports Digest; Recreational Drugs and PEDs in Sport Should be Treated Differently


I’ve been meaning to write this article for a while and now seems as good a time as any given the allegations about Tyson Fury testing positive for cocaine.

Each sport is governed differently of course so this is going to be pretty general, but by in large most sporting governing bodies don’t differentiate between performance enhancing banned substances and illegal recreational ones – but should they?

As it happens the World Anti-Doping Agency does treat some recreational substances differently and cocaine is not a banned substance when taken out-of -competition.  The definition of “in-competition” and “out-of-competition” depends on the sport and the testing authority , which leaves things open to interpretation. Most PEDs are also banned out-of-competition and that is admittedly a tangible difference. Like I say, this is a general thing.  In-competition cocaine use will get you a ban, and a big one. Hull City’s Jake Livermore was facing a two-year suspension but the FA, quite rightly, opted not to extend his ban due to exceptional circumstances.  French tennis player Richard Gasguet had a two-and-a-half month suspension after a positive cocaine test, which ruled he had consumed “no more than a grain of salt”, which probably happens when you watch ‘Narcos’ on Netflix.

My argument is Livermore, Gasquet and others shouldn’t really have even had to deal with that anyway.

‘Fun’ drugs shouldn’t be regarded in the same way as PEDs, in or out of competition.  My key point is they simply don’t give a competitive advantage, sticking with boxing and marching powder as it is the topic du jour – if you think there is an advantage in being coked up during a professional fight you’re wrong (not that Fury necessarily was/has been of course).  The booger sugar might feel like a boost when you’re throwing fists with someone who’s just spilled your drink in the Dog and Duck; but in a ring, where you need your wits about you and a cool, calm head it is not an advantage.  Unless you’re an animal type fighter like Mike Tyson… that kid was a rare breed though.

Team sports are different, granted.  The individual is employed by the club and being a stoner, space cadet or a raver is going to impact on performances. Sanctions in this case should come from the club, I see no real reason why governing bodies need to get involved in such issues.

Employers in sport do have the right to fire any player (not employee – player) if they are using recreational drugs.  I cannot argue against that.  If you own an NBA franchise and are paying someone $15million+ a season – you get to tell that guy he can’t smoke weed.  That’s fair enough, essentially the athlete’s physical prowess is part of the deal and they have a responsibility to ensure they’re in top form.  That doesn’t mean it should be an obligation because no one would axe LeBron James for rocking up tripping on magic mushrooms.  However, to get sacked and then face time out due to a governing body, that seems unnecessary for substances that have no positive impact on performance.

Maybe I’m too liberal, maybe not. I don’t really believe in prohibition as a concept or an effective method. I just don’t think it works and there’s enough evidence to back up that viewpoint (see further reading, have a google). People will do what they want to do at the end of the day legal issues aside, I doubt there are many teetotallers out there who would be full blown smack fiends if heroin wasn’t outlawed, for example.

I’m fully aware there are other issues too.  Sports stars are supposed to be ‘role models’, whatever that really means, by keeping on the straight and narrow, but drugs are a part of everyday life for many people, whether or not they realise it. Is drug abuse any more immoral than cheating on a partner? Using prostitutes? Violence? I would say no, but hookers and fisticuffs probably won’t leave your career in tatters (examples include; alleged call girl user and England captain Wayne Rooney and Watford striker Troy Deeney, who was found guilty of assault in 2012).

You could club alcohol and tobacco in with recreational drugs and arguably they’re as, if not more, detrimental to health and performance than the likes of marijuana, MDMA, cocaine… but because they’re not illegal there are no real sanctions in or out of competition.  Having the odd night on ecstasy in-competition is probably no more damaging than hitting the booze but the drink is fine and the pills are not. If a sportsperson is using a substance and as such ruins the experience for the fans with sub-par performances that’s not on, obviously, but if they can still entertain and get results… what’s the big deal?

There is an argument that people in other walks of life would get sacked for drug taking but not in all areas.  I’ve had jobs before where bosses do lines with members of staff on nights out (and to ‘recover’ the day after) and where one employee seems like he’s there specifically to act as a dealer, with the odd bit of photocopying and tea making on the side due to ineptness in every other relevant area.

I’m not going to bother with a conclusion, I think I’ve expressed my opinion well enough throughout so I’ll leave it with some optional further reading.  Good luck to Tyson Fury as well, it looks like he’s got a long road ahead of him but no one can take away the fact that for a brief period he was the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world.  I’ll finish by pointing out that failing a drugs test for cocaine out-of-competition is more widespread than you’d imagine, but mostly it doesn’t get mentioned as bans won’t happen.  As the heavyweight champion of the world however, and being the divisive figure he is, Tyson Fury should have been more careful.


Reasons to legalise all drugs via Urban75.

Tyson Fury bits via The Guardian & ESPN

Photo Credit: My buddy Dave.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.


Were The Telegraph Right to Sting Sam Allardyce?

Former England boss Sam Allardyce did, in his own words, a “silly thing” by talking to undercover reporters masquerading as businessmen.

Had it been any other  football management position, he probably wouldn’t have been given the boot but the England role is direct with the FA, whose player transfer rules he advised on “getting around”.

For what it is worth I still think he’d have done a good job if given the chance but that is neither here nor there really now, and I doubt the likely candidates (Gareth Southgate, Steve Bruce, Alan Pardew and Eddie Howe at the moment) are an upgrade. Again that’s a moot point and the only real option was to part company; his position had become untenable regardless of your viewpoint on his actions with those undercover journalists.

There are a lot of points to consider in this whole mess but I’m going to keep this fairly brief and focus solely on the journalistic methods used.

Was the Telegraph’s use of subterfuge, or to borrow from Sam Allardyce ‘entrapment’, justified?

That’s a big question but without knowing any more I’m going to have to stay on the fence and here’s why.

Entrapment as a form of journalism can be as – or more – seedy than the thing it is trying to expose.  Consider the ongoing Fake Sheik trial as an example, where Sun journalist Mazher Mahmood is accused of tampering with evidence in the collapsed drugs trial of Tulisa Contostavlos.

This case may be a little different depending on what The Telegraph have unearthed further.  They claim they have eight current and former Premier League managers accused of taking ‘bungs’ to facilitate deals, in something perhaps more serious than Allardyce’s indiscretions.

Whether or not the newspaper’s actions are justifiable depends on what information they had in the first place to act, or whether it was simply a ‘fishing’ exercise. If they had good reason then this was probably the only way to get the proof they needed, if they just threw some bait out there looking for a bite… that’s questionable behaviour at best. Maybe we’ll never really know the answer to this and as such what happens next is vital.

It reminds me of The Times’ sting earlier this year on doping.  The case involving the ‘doping doctor’ Mark Bonar, which didn’t really come to anything near what was promised in the original expose. That suggested  around 150 elite sports stars, or a percentage of, would be unveiled as dopers but it just didn’t happen.

Because there’s supposedly much more to come I’m going to take a ‘wait and see’ approach regarding The Telegraph’s methods here.  If, as they promise, they uncover widespread corruption within British football in regards to transfer dealings, third party ownership, bungs, bribes, pay-offs etc etc then their methods will have been justified.  If it all fizzles out to nothing and Allardyce was in actual fact their mother load, quite a few people are going to feel pretty short changed by this whole debacle.

I’ll come back to this when we know a bit more, let’s see what The Telegraph comes up with.

Further Reading:

The original Telegraph article.

And more from The Telegraph.

Mark Bonar bits, via myselfThe Times and the Daily Mail.

Gonzo article on Allardyce prior to his appointment.

Fake Sheik via Sky News.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.

Manchester United, Jose Mourinho and Some Perspective

I can’t really believe I’m writing this but I’ve decided to launch a defence of Jose Mourinho.

Three defeats means the world has fallen apart for Manchester United, apparently.  I thought people in this country have had enough of experts but it looks like that doesn’t apply to the world of football, just politics. 

Already we’re seeing stats comparing Mourinho’s United with Louis van Gaal’s, his Chelsea figures from last season have made an appearance, pundits are falling over themselves to offer a viewpoint… I’d say the football community have an insatiable desire for experts and statistics based on this evidence.

Somewhat understandably, a noticeable majority within the media have used it as an excuse to turn the knife.  A quick google of Jose Mourinho and stuff like ‘dressing room split’, ‘murky medical…’, ‘players shocked by Mourinho’s treatment of…’ etc etc. It isn’t good reading.

As an individual he has a strained relationship with the press; often showing outright disdain, sometimes being overly aggressive and always acting as if he’d rather be anywhere else other than having talking to you.  That means he’s going to get a rough ride more often than not, and there are plenty out there who just like taking shots at United as well.

Me included, but you’ve got to be fair.  So let’s break a few of those issues down a bit.  We’ll start with the losses, then move on to the rumours and other jibes.

The Manchester Derby Defeat

The Mourinho honeymoon period came to an abrupt end at Old Trafford in the first Manchester derby of the season as Man City ran out 2-1 winners.  In truth I don’t think United were playing particularly well beforehand and that display against City was no real shock.

City probably just about deserved that win but the result really could have gone either way.  Kelechi Iheanacho was played onside with such naivety for the second and there’s not really any way a manager can legislate for that, it is just human error.  Claudio Bravo was lucky not to give at least one more away for City and Zlatan Ibrahimovic saw a great chance blocked late on as well as they pushed for an equaliser.  The defeat is a bad result but there was enough evidence in that game to suggest United can beat City, which has to be encouraging.

… Feyenoord?

Yes Manchester United should be beating Feyenoord both home and away, but that’s not to say the Dutch side are a bad team and at De Kuip they can give anyone a game.

Mourinho has made no real secret that he’s not that bothered about the Europa League and going out early might not be a disaster all things considered if they’re challenging on a few fronts elsewhere later in the season.  I do think they’ll get out of the group they’re in regardless of that defeat though, having been also drawn with Fenerbahce and Zorya Luhansk. If they qualify this result will be almost irrelevant anyway – especially if they top the standings.

Come on, what about Watford?

Admittedly this is a shocker.  Perhaps the pressure of having already lost two in a row played a part here, who knows?  I didn’t actually watch this game so can’t offer any kind of analysis in full confidence but on paper this is a bad result.

Other Issues for Jose Mourinho

His treatment of Bastian Schweinsteiger is incredibly harsh, and some of his comments about Luke Shaw after that Watford defeat were below the belt.  In the German’s case; he’s been frozen out and Mourinho tried to get rid in the summer but there were no takers, at least none willing to match his wage demands. He could have brought him into the fold after the window shut but he’s decided there’s no place for the midfielder in his team and – quite clearly – now wants him off the wage bill in January if possible.

For Shaw; I can’t see how that kind of criticism helps a player but at the same time mountains and molehills spring to mind for the subsequent reaction.

Here’s what he said: “And here for the second [Watford] goal, [Nordin] Amrabat receives the ball and our left-back is 25 metres from him instead of five metres. But even at 25 metres, you have to jump and go and press, but no, we wait.

“This is a tactical but also a mental attitude. It’s something that doesn’t become perfect in a couple of weeks.”

Perhaps ill advised but then again it isn’t so bad, it may have been better to keep this kind of thing in the dressing room though.  Shaw has two options really – he either sulks or he could suck it up and step up his game, seeing it as proof the manager thinks he is capable of much better.

If United lose in the EFL Cup at Northampton later this could all go out the window but my thinking is there will be no knee-jerk reaction from the hierarchy just yet.  They’ve paid a lot of money to bring Mourinho in and then given him a lot more to get a squad together.  The United fans are a fairly patient bunch when it comes to managers, although perhaps there is a bit more urgency for success after the David Moyes and Louis van Gaal tenures. There’s certainly more to come from summer buys Paul Pogba and Henrikh Mkhitaryan and I’m fairly sure the now seemingly not-so-Special One will be given a decent amount of time to get them and others playing to their full potential.

This constant analysis and criticism is quite frankly boring, it feels like too many just couldn’t wait for the wheels to fall off and have jumped the gun at the first sign of trouble.  The money spent in the summer may have lead to expectations of instant success but you have to remember he took over a struggling, underperforming side and they will give him time to make it right.

For whatever it’s worth I don’t think Mourinho is the right coach for United and I never have done. I don’t think his philosophy on how the game should be played fits at Old Trafford, and his reluctance to use younger players is at odds with the recent history at United. However, now he is in the hot seat he deserves more than five Premier League games before a fair assessment is made, and the club will be thinking along those lines too even if the media are not.

Further Reading:

Stuff on Luke Shaw via the MEN.

BBC expert Danny Murphy offers his thoughts on Jose Mourinho and Manchester United.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.  



Gonzo Sports Guest Article: What I have Learnt About Being a Football Club Journalist for a Month

Just over a month ago I said goodbye to Jacque Talbot but for reasons known only to him he’s decided to come back.  Here he takes us through his experiences of working for a non-league club, enjoy.

My first match report/ How to do a novice match report

Job opportunities are few and far between for aspiring sports writers, that’s why is vitally important to say yes to almost every proposition that you come across.

It’s fair to say a writing job with an unnamed football club (they do have a name really, they are not actually unnamed or called unnamed football club), landed in my lap mostly by a good piece of fortune, yet I must stress that in this line of work, you do enable your own luck.

No sooner had I hastily applied for the job vacancy ‘club journalist’ online than I was travelling to their secluded stadium, in midst of the North-West, to liaison with the club secretary and take a look around the ground and training facilities.

Now fast forward to our first agreed match to which I would be reporting: it was 3rd September and a miserable, wet day in Ashton – a small town just outside Wigan. I regrettably misread the bus timetable (I was in town about two hours early), but also had the good fortune to miscalculate the point at which to get off the bus, which in turn resulted in a tiresome, long, soaky trod in the pouring rain, to fill up my time until kick-off. I guess it was a somewhat bittersweet occasion.

The stadium was hidden in the depths of a housing estate on the edge of town. There was advertising boards surrounding the pitch and a stand which fitted several rows of plastic, red, foldable seats, where a single onlooker was already present.

My long walk had cut my time sizably, but there was still about half hour to go, so, keeping in the spirit of the profound immersion of this anecdotal article, I will briefly describe to you how I prepare myself fully before a match starts:

You should exercise a bit of pragmatism so, you need to; bring a number of pens in case one runs out, turn your phone on silent so you don’t get distracted; take with you at least two notepads– one smaller to log the live reporting and one larger notepad so you can start writing your report immediately after (I’ll explain this one further in the article); make sure you dress for the occasion: as silly as it sounds, wearing comfortable clothing during for the match will enable to have your mind thinking both punctually and with clarity.

Positioning is also imperative. You won’t be able to clearly illustrate a game to an audience, a match you’ve watched through the bar window of the clubhouse. Therefore, get there early enough that you have a vast choice in selecting a position which gives you a great view of all ends of the pitch, and with the freedom to move towards areas of significance (such as closer to the 18 yard box to see a forthcoming penalty)- if you have the environmental capability to do so.

In smaller notepad, you should have already laid the foundations –write both teams names at the top of your first page and draw a line underneath. Then put a single line down the middle of the page and in-between the two names, giving something resembling a Christ cross with two club names balancing on the ridge at either end. The idea is to write events, as the match progresses, and chronologically state events under the name of the club you are commenting on. If you make the mistake of writing the events side by side, what you’ll be left with is a mismatch in timeframe, rendering you with just guesswork.

Now with a couple of seconds away from kick off, you may have or may not have the team sheets on your person. If you do not, you have to ask for this after the match from one of the club officials – every football match will have a team sheet, they wouldn’t be able to ‘legally’ play without one.

Regardless, you won’t need to use one until after the match has been played, the way to keep track (On the presumption that you don’t know the player names because it’s your first gig) is to take note of player numbers whilst they play and add them to your notepad whenever a literal-noteworthy event takes place with the said player (or in this case, the said number) on it.

You must also need to work out a key for yourself and write in down in a suitable place or memorise it. This which will enable you to knowledgably jot the ‘code’ down on your journal, quickly and precisely.

Here I will write out a section of my notepad by way of example:

RW O-B 7-11-7, G7 FT I-B LW LF HTR, A11 ’57.

What looks like code is actually a whole lot of useful information for me to write a detailed description of this particular event later on. Without defining every-single piece of information there, I will merely write this out in correct form:

Number 7 plays a one-two with number 11 outside the box on the right wing, the return pass sees number 7 score a goal with a first time shot, inside the box, on the left wing, with his/her left boot, hard into the top right of the net, assisted by number 11, on the fifty seventh minute.

How much you write is up to you, I tend to write as much information as possible due to my lack of confidence in my own memory. You will also be writing the code (I’m deliberately not using the word ‘short-hand’ that’s a whole other complicated game, which can be learnt through NCTJ courses) during the period the action happens, so you better get used to writing on you notepad without actually looking at it.

Of course there is no way of knowing when a massive event is about to unfold in a game, so you have to keep writing somewhat constantly and particularly when the teams(s) get the ball in dangerous areas. Remember too, it’s not just goals you need to report, it’s yellow/red cards, fights, chances, missed penalties, great saves and general commentary on the games narrative: ‘St.Madeupstone are seeing a lot of the ball, but Cantthinkofasecondname United are defending well, closing down aggressively and making decent counter-attacks.

These comments can be made through the centre of your drawn line, particularly when the ball goes out of play and there is some time to reflect on the game so far. The centralisation of your comment will establish to you that it is an overall thought about the match entirely, and not of a specific club.

Once you finish logging the game and the match is finished, you may use the team sheet, and find the player’s names through the numbers matching them on paper – turning ‘number 7’ into ‘actual first and second name.’

Straight after the game is when you need to write up your match report in the larger notepad. Make valuable use of your time commuting, whether you are on comfy train with a table or on a bus wedged between a fragile window and a pensioner, it’s an absolute must that you write out your report whilst it is still fresh in your mind.

At first you may find this hard, but after time you will surely be able write it up with relative ease and speed. After three games into my match-reporting career, I got my report sent-off within the hour of the final whistle. The professional journalists, working at the nationals, have a match report to ready to read online within about ten minutes of the game finishing.

It’s something I do not personally, yet most professionals will usually have the first half of a match report written during the half time interval. I prefer having a cup of tea and sandwich instead – again, these are not rules and regulations, just ideas and prompts to help you.

The aforementioned match I attended my first time, ended in a waterlogged pitch just before the game started. I actually thought the pouring rain attributed to the authenticity of watching a British, non-league game. The reason being that a tiny area of the pitch, just by an obscure side by the corner flag, was deemed unplayable. It was a nervy experience, as I seldom found anything online when I researched for advice.

So this is why I thought I would put some advice out there for the aspirational reporters who need it. For any budding sports writers who are approaching their very first match as a reporter.

Please feel free get in touch with me for any more advice, or see if you find any decent educational videos on YouTube from the pros.

You can find Jacque on Twitter here; @Jac_Talbot

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.

What Next for Kell Brook?

The Gennady Golovkin fight didn’t pan out as I’d expected for Kell Brook; I didn’t give him much of a chance and thought he’d get overwhelmed pretty quickly.

My public guess (not on here) was GGG within five rounds and Brook did get stopped in the fifth but he would have carried on if he’d been allowed – that’s not to say I don’t think Dominic Ingle made the right call, he 100% did.  There was no way Brook was coming back to win that; he’d taken enough punishment and the corner saved him from a further battering.

Golovkin quite literally broke his face and Brook now requires surgery on his eye socket.  Both fighters were probably a bit disingenuous in their post-fight comments as the Kazakh said he wasn’t hurt and the British weight jumper claimed he was just getting started.  In truth, Brook had used all his tricks up but if anything that just antagonised GGG to step up a gear, it was more a case of poking the beast rather than tranquilising it, and he wasn’t throwing much back or dodging particularly well when the towel did go in.

For Golovkin it depends on how you define hurt.  Maybe he didn’t feel anything that made him worry there was any chance of him being taken out but Brook connected well a couple of times and he knew he was in a scrap.  There was definitely a reaction from the middleweight king in the third round after some good work from Brook in the second (even though that’s when his facial injury happened), and his face had more marks on than usual at the end of the affair.

But where does Kell Brook go from this now?  Sticking around at middleweight seems unlikely, for one thing he’s taken on the division’s top dog and his best wasn’t good enough.  I also can’t see too many more middleweights queuing up to take the risk either after his efforts against Golovkin, because he certainly didn’t disgrace himself on Saturday night at the O2.

The drop back down to welterweight may not be an option either.  He was already avoided at that level and getting back down to make the weight again could be a struggle, although a possible match-up with Amir Khan – a fight he’s always wanted – could be a key motivating factor there.  Khan also had his own middleweight outing of course but there’s no way he’ll be sticking at that level and I would imagine he’ll be back at 147lbs in his next outing whenever that may be.

That leaves the 154lbs mark and there is a potential match-up with Khan’s conqueror Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez on the horizon should the Mexican overcome Liam Smith, who would also be an option should he pull off a shock next weekend.

Brook and his team now need to go back to the drawing board to figure out their next move but I expect there was a contingency plan in the event of a loss to Golovkin.  No matter how confident they may have been outwardly it would be foolish not to have a back-up plan.  He has time on his side now though, as that injury should keep him out of the ring for a while.

The IBF welterweight champion did say he’d be up for a rematch but Golovkin won’t go down that route.  He made it clear he wants to unify the middleweight division so perhaps we’ll see him back in the UK soon for Billy Joe Saunders, or maybe he’ll go after Canelo again despite the fact he vacated the WBC belt and dropped down a division – after all that’s still the fight we all want to see.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.

Gonzo Guest Article; Money Talks and Goodbye to Jac

Jac has written a few pieces for the Gonzo team (can a team be one man? I don’t see why not, Manchester United were for a lot of last season but anyway) but now he’s moving on to pastures new. This will be his last for a while in all probability; he’ll be sorely missed as now I have to write my own stuff.  Here he examines whether or not money has ruined football.  You can find him here on Twitter @Jac_Talbot, or here – www.jactal.wordpress.com – on his very own shiny new site.  As ever publication doesn’t imply endorsement or agreement.

How money corrupts our football ideals

In 1996, Alan Shearer broke the British transfer record, with Newcastle paying just over £15million for him. Now 20 years later, Shearer’s a dull pundit and a 22-year-old Frenchman going by the name of Paul Pogba is about to smash the record again, with Manchester United set to pay £110million pounds for the midfielder.

Some will begrudgingly understand the climate of the modern game, whilst others will surely scoff and proclaim that this is just getting too much.

When the Fernando Torres and Andy Carroll transfers went through in January 2011, for a combined £80m+, there seemed to be a dawn upon the game; no more would a £10m transfer seem a hefty price, nor would the idea of the £40m sum swoop seem particularly devastating.

Nowadays it is customary to spend such large amounts on players with just a high-quality potential. There is also the added factor that many of the top-top teams (think of your Barcelonas, Real Madrids and Bayern Munichs), have formulated a habit of keeping the world’s best in their own circles.

Pogba is another instance of this. What’s been highlighted before is the fact that he now faces a year without Champions League football – the must-do stage for the stars to shine. As a man destined to be the world’s best he has, in actuality, sold himself short for monetary gain.

Lionel Messi, one of the world’s highest paid footballers, recently got a suspended jail sentence for tax fraud. The £200,000 weekly salary should have been enough for the Argentine superstar but seemingly it wasn’t.

Money also has a nasty habit of sabotaging ideals within football; passion, love, loyalty… all rendered essentially insignificant by cold hard cash. The unbelievable Premier League win by Leicester City spawned, as Claudio Ranieri put it, a dream-like-reality to which all the fans and players of the Foxes could be a part of.

This did not stop N’Golo Kante, the heart of Leicester’s team, jumping ship to mid-table Chelsea. This transfer epitomises the era we live in.  For me, the singular reason for Kante’s transfer was for higher wages – like Pogba, he misses out on Champions League football as a result of the move.

Professional footballers, have only one thing in mind; money. They do have a very short career span which averages to between 11-15 years. Post retirement there is not much they can do apart from coaching and punditry, and even then there are a very short amount of positions available.

Perhaps we should stop putting our faith in individual players and save our love purely for our clubs.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.

Premier League Contenders, part deux

No need for an intro to this one, here we go.

Arsenal. Best odds 13/2.

Arsenal are the joint third favourites alongside Chelsea with the bookies ahead of the big kick off. The Gunners managed to sneak second last season but their title bid had faded much earlier. Can they do it this year?

For: It could be Arsene Wenger’s last season in charge and he’ll be desperate to finish with some big silverware if that is the case.  Granit Xhaka is a top signing, perhaps just what they needed in midfield, and fellow summer recruit Rob Holding is also a decent acquisition, although whether he’ll have a big role to play in the season ahead remains unclear.  If they can get Alexis Sanchez, Mesut Ozil and a few others firing anything is possible

Against: If Wenger doesn’t agree a new deal or confirm that he’s leaving there will be a lot of uncertainty and that can have an impact on the squad.  Aside from that there are the usual doubts for the Emirates Stadium side.  Can they avoid their now standard mid-season slump? Will the rigours of European action prove detrimental to their domestic hopes? Can they win the league without a real marquee striker? Is their defence strong enough? And so on.

Tottenham Hotspur. Best odds 10/1.

Spurs gave Leicester the closest challenge last season but their form dipped at the end.  I’m quite tempted at 10/1 if I’m being honest, but I’m not sure whether or not I actually fancy them to win the league or if I just think they’re good value.

For: I’m convinced Spurs will continue on an upward trajectory under Mauricio Pochettino but whether or not that will result in a league title at some point is another question.  Vincent Janssen scored for fun in the Netherlands last season and could be the foil/competition Harry Kane needs to push on further.  Victor Wanyama is another shrewd bit of business from the White Hart Lane club and if Eric Dier and Dele Alli can continue to improve they look a stronger side than last season.

Against: There were a fair few Spurs men in the England squad this summer and none really came out with a great deal of credit, Dier aside perhaps.  Do they have the strength in depth to mount a sustained challenge if a key man gets injured?

Liverpool. Best odds 10/1.

Liverpool missed out on the top four last year but maybe they’d have made it if Jurgen Klopp had been in charge for the whole season, who knows?

For: Klopp is a quality manager and – like Pochettino at Spurs – I can only see the Anfield side improving under his guidance.  The capture of Loris Karius this summer was a great move and I think he’ll move ahead of Simon Mignolet in the pecking order when he returns from an untimely injury.  Maybe they overpaid for Sadio Mane but he’s a proven Premier League forward and Joel Matip from Schalke was another good move, I’ll confess I’ve not seen fellow new boy Ragnar Klavan enough to pass comment.

Against: Looking at their squad, I don’t see their best 11 as a title winning side.  I could be wrong of course (who picked out Leicester last year?) and Klopp is a brilliant tactician and motivator – he managed to wrestle the Bundesliga title away from Bayern Munich twice with Borussia Dortmund.  The hunger among the Anfield faithful for silverware might see Liverpool really go for one or both of the cups and that might see them fall short in a Premier League bid.

Leicester. Best odds 33/1.

Has anyone mentioned Leicester were 5000/1 at the start of last season? This year the holders are 33/1.

For: They did it last year and Jamie Vardy didn’t join Arsenal.  If they can keep Riyad Mahrez and find an N’Golo Kante replacement, which they may already have done with Nampalys Medny then who knows?

Against: Losing Kante was a hammer blow to any hopes the Foxes had of retaining the title.  Personally, I don’t think they’ll do it but then again I didn’t last year.  I did believe a bit before most though and am still kicking myself I didn’t jump on and back them at 20/1 around January – stupid Gonzo. They’ll be a real target now as holders as well of course, other than that the big questions are can their squad maintain the levels they managed last season? And will the Champions League prove to be too much of an ask on what is a fairly small group of players in comparison to their rivals? My guess is No and Yes respectively for those two.

And there we go, I’m not going to pick out a winner but I think the title will probably be heading to Manchester. Liverpool are 13/8 to finish in the top four and Spurs are 11/8 – at least one of them will do it I’d think.  Leicester meanwhile are 12/5 to finish in the top six, which is still a big ask but more than doable.

I’ve used Oddschecker for the best prices.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.

Premier League Contenders, part 1.

Last season Leicester City won the Premier League having been 5000/1 at the start of the season, a fact everyone must know by now.  You won’t get anywhere near that price on anyone this year though, the bookies have topped out at 1500/1 for the likes of West Brom, Watford, Sunderland and Bournemouth as well as the three newly-promoted clubs; Middlesbrough, Hull and Burnley.

I’m not going to plump for a winner at this stage myself, at least not until all the transfer business is done, but I thought I’d take a look at the contenders as the season draws closer.

Manchester City. Best price 13/5.

City were never really in it last year, at least not in the second half of the season.  I don’t think the timing of the Pep Guardiola announcement helped them really, it can’t have been too easy for Manuel Pellegrini to motivate his players with everyone knowing he was on his way out.  Expectations are high this year though following the arrival of the Catalan coach. Can he do it in his first season in England?

For: Guardiola himself is a serial winner but this could be his biggest challenge to date, will he be able to hit the ground running or will the transition to England’s top flight take a while? Only time will tell. They’ve done some good, if a tad limited, business so far this summer with the captures of Ilkay Gundogan, Nolito and Alexander Zinchenko. Gundogan is pure class, Nolito carries a real goal threat but I’ve not seen enough of Zinchenko to comment.

Against: Their defence looks a little suspect still and will anyone be able to fill the void should Sergio Aguero sustain an injury? What about Vincent Kompany? They looked poor without him last season and as yet there have been no recruits at the back should he suffer another injury-hit campaign. They are working on bringing in some defensive reinforcements but so far their pursuit of John Stones has proved fruitless.

City have every chance but at 13/5 I won’t be risking any money on them just yet, a new centre-half or two and I might change my mind.

Manchester United. Best price 18/5.

Like City, United were way out of the title battle last season but the arrival of Jose Mourinho as manager has seen them installed as the second favourites.  He does have experience of winning the Premier League of course, still this price looks a little short to me.

For: Mourinho is the big draw but they’ve brought in some good signings as well.  Henrikh Mkhitaryan is a top performer, Zlatan Ibrahimovic is guaranteed goals, even at the grand old age of 34, and moving Wayne Rooney back into a more advanced position could pay dividends.  If Paul Pogba joins they’ll be a real force, and the lack of Champions League football could allow them to focus more on domestic glory.

Against: United carried too many passengers last season as only a handful performed at the level required – Mourinho has to make sure everyone, or at least his first 11, are at the top of their game.  And how long will it take to get over the hangover of Louis van Gaal’s time in charge?

Chelsea. Best price 6/1.

If United and City were off the pace last season, Chelsea weren’t even in the same race. They find themselves as the third favourites this year though and again a new boss, Antonio Conte, is the reason for the optimism.

For:  The turmoil of the early part of last season appears to now be over thanks to Guus Hiddink’s second interim spell so I wouldn’t worry about that too much. In terms of transfers, N’Golo Kante is a brilliant signing and Michy Batshuayi has a lot of promise.  Like United, there is no Champions League to worry about and the Premier League will be the primary target.

Against: Conte knows how to build a team, he left Juventus years ago and the bones of his side is still winning Serie A every year.  It might not be instant success at Chelsea but if they keep the faith in the wily old Italian it will pay off, which may not translate into instant success in the coming campaign.  Again a lot will depend on how quickly Conte can adapt, and they probably need a few more additions to be truly competitive in the title battle.  Will Diego Costa stay or will a replacement be required? And if he does stay, will Chelsea see the best of him or will we see some petulance? What about John Terry, can the aging war-horse keep playing at the top level throughout a whole season?

My concern with all three of the favourites is the new manager factor.  The prices on City and United are way too short to tempt me, Chelsea look a good prospect at 6/1 though so if you fancy the Londoners I’d get on now before they bring in any more players and the odds shorten.

I was going to cover all the contenders but this already long enough so I’ll end it here.  I’ll be back in a few days with Arsenal, Liverpool, Spurs and champions Leicester.

As always I’ve used Oddschecker to hunt out the best prices, I’m not affiliated with them and there are other services available but these guys are the best in my experience.

Follow/abuse us on Twitter @GonzoSportsDesk, we’re not fancy we follow back.